diff options
author | Joe Hunkeler <jhunkeler@gmail.com> | 2015-08-11 16:51:37 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joe Hunkeler <jhunkeler@gmail.com> | 2015-08-11 16:51:37 -0400 |
commit | 40e5a5811c6ffce9b0974e93cdd927cbcf60c157 (patch) | |
tree | 4464880c571602d54f6ae114729bf62a89518057 /noao/twodspec/apextract/doc/old/apextract.ms | |
download | iraf-osx-40e5a5811c6ffce9b0974e93cdd927cbcf60c157.tar.gz |
Repatch (from linux) of OSX IRAF
Diffstat (limited to 'noao/twodspec/apextract/doc/old/apextract.ms')
-rw-r--r-- | noao/twodspec/apextract/doc/old/apextract.ms | 725 |
1 files changed, 725 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/noao/twodspec/apextract/doc/old/apextract.ms b/noao/twodspec/apextract/doc/old/apextract.ms new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3e71890b --- /dev/null +++ b/noao/twodspec/apextract/doc/old/apextract.ms @@ -0,0 +1,725 @@ +.EQ +delim $$ +define sl '{s lambda}' +.EN +.RP +.TL +The IRAF APEXTRACT Package +.AU +Francisco Valdes +.AI +IRAF Group - Central Computer Services +.K2 +P.O. Box 26732, Tucson, Arizona 85726 +.AB +The IRAF \fBapextract\fR package provides tools for the extraction of +one and two dimensional spectra from two dimensional images +such as echelle, long slit, multi-fiber, and multi-slit spectra. +Apertures of fixed width along the spatial define the regions of +the two dimensional images to be extracted at each point along the +dispersion axis. Apertures may follow changes in the positions of +the spectra as a function of position along the dispersion axis. +The spatial and dispersion axes may be oriented along either image axis. +Extraction to one dimensional spectra consists of a weighted sum of the pixels +within the apertures at each point along the dispersion axis. The +weighting options provide the simple sum of the pixel values and a +weighting by the expected uncertainty of each pixel. Two dimensional +extractions interpolate the spectra in the spatial axis to produce +image strips with the position of the spectra exactly aligned with one +of the image dimensions. The extractions also include optional +background subtraction, modeling, and bad pixel detection and replacement. +The tasks are flexible in their ability to define and edit apertures, +operate on lists of images, use apertures defined for reference +images, and operate both very interactively or noninteractively. +The extraction tasks are efficient and require only one pass through +the data. This paper describes the tasks, the algorithms, the data +structures, as well as some examples and possible future developments. +.AE +.NH +Introduction +.PP +The IRAF \fBapextract\fR package provides tools for the extraction of +one and two dimensional aperture spectra from two dimensional format +images such as those produced by echelle, long slit, multi-fiber, and +multi-slit spectrographs. This type of data is becoming increasingly +popular because of the efficiency of data collection and recent +technological improvements such as fibers and digital detectors. +The trend is also to greater and greater numbers of spectra per +image. Extraction is one of the fundamental operations performed +on these types of two dimensional spectral images, so a great deal of effort +has gone into the design and development of this package. +.PP +The tasks are flexible and have many options. To make the best use of +them it is important to understand how they work. This paper provides +a general description of the tasks, the algorithms, the data structures, +as well as some examples of usage. Specific descriptions of parameters +and usage may be found in the IRAF help pages for the tasks included +as appendices to this paper. The image reduction "cookbooks" also +provide complete examples of usage for specific instruments or types +of instruments. +.PP +The tasks in the \fBapextract\fR pacakge are summarized below. + +.ce +The \fBApextract\fR Package +.TS +center; +n. +apdefault \&- Set the default aperture parameters +apedit \&- Edit apertures interactively +apfind \&- Automatically find spectra and define apertures +apio \&- Set the I/O parameters for the APEXTRACT tasks +apnormalize \&- Normalize 2D apertures by 1D functions +apstrip \&- Extract two dimensional aperture strips +apsum \&- Extract one dimensional aperture sums +aptrace \&- Trace positions of spectra +.TE + +The tasks are highly integrated so that one task may call another tasks +or use its parameters. Thus, these tasks reflect the logical organization +of the package rather than a set of disparate tools. One reason for +this organization is group the parameters by function into easy to manage +\fIparameter sets (psets)\fR. The tasks \fBapdefault\fR and \fBapio\fR +are just psets for specifying the default aperture parameters and the +I/O parameters of the package; in other words, they do nothing but +provide a grouping of parameters. Executing these tasks is a shorthand +for the command "eparam apdefault" or "eparam apio". The other tasks +provide both a logical grouping of parameters and function. For +example the task \fBaptrace\fR traces the positions of the spectra +in the images and has the parameters related to tracing. The task +\fBapsum\fR, however, may trace the spectra as part of the overall +extraction process and it uses the functionality and parameters of +the \fBaptrace\fR task without requiring all the tracing parameters +be included as part of its parameter set. As we examine each task +in detail it will become more apparent how this integration of function +and parameters works. +.PP +The \fBapextract\fR package identifies the image axes with the spatial +and dispersion axes. Thus, during extraction pixels of constant +wavelength are those along a line or column. In this paper the terms +\fIslit\fR or \fIspatial\fR axis and \fIdispersion\fR or \fIwavelength\fR +axis are used to refer to the image axes corresponding to the spatial +and dispersion axes. Often a small degree of misalignment between the +image axes and the true dispersion and spatial axes is not important. +The main effect of misalignment is a broadening of the spectral +features due to the difference in wavelength on opposite sides of the +extraction aperture. If the misalignment is significant, however, the +image may be rotated with the task \fBrotate\fR in the \fBimages\fR +package or remapped with the \fBlongslit\fR package tasks for +coordinate rectification. +.PP +It does not matter which image axis is the dispersion axis since the +tasks work equally well in either orientation. However, the dispersion +axis must be defined, with the \fBtwodspec\fR task \fBsetdisp\fR, +before these tasks may be used. This task is a simple script which +adds the parameter DISPAXIS to the image headers. The \fBapextract\fR +tasks, like the \fBlongslit\fR tasks, look in the header to determine +the dispersion axis. +.NH +Apertures +.PP +Apertures are the basic data structures used in the package; hence the +package name. An aperture defines a region of the two dimensional image +to be extracted. The aperture definitions are stored in a database. +An aperture consists of the following components. + +.IP ID +.br +An integer identification number. The identification number must be +unique. It is used as the default extension during extraction of +the spectra. Typically the IDs are consecutive positive integers +ordered by increasing or decreasing slit position. +.IP BEAM +.br +An integer beam number. The beam number need not be +unique; i.e. several apertures may have the same beam number. +The beam number will be recorded in the image header of the +the extracted spectrum. By default the beam number is the same as +the ID. +.IP APAXIS +.IP CENTER[2] +.br +The center of the aperture along the slit and dispersion axes in the two +dimensional image. +.IP LOWER[2] +.br +The lower limits of the aperture, relative to the aperture center, +along the slit and dispersion axes. The lower limits need not be less +than the center. +.IP UPPER[2] +.br +The upper limits of the aperture, relative to the aperture center, +along the slit and dispersion axes. The upper limits need not be greater +than the center. +.IP CURVE +.br +An offset to be added to the center position for the \fIslit\fR axis which is +a function of the wavelength. The function is one of the standard IRAF +types; a legendre polynomial, a chebyshev polynomial, a linear spline, +or a cubic spline. +.IP background +.br +Parameters for background subtraction based on the interactive +curve fitting (\fBicfit\fR) tools. + +.PP +The aperture center is the only absolute coordinate (relative to the +image or image section). The other aperture parameters and the +background fitting regions are defined relative to the center. Thus, +an aperture may be repositioned easily by changing the center +coordinates. Also a constant aperture size, shape (curve), and +background regions may be maintained for many apertures. The center +and aperture limits, in image coordinates, along the slit axis are +given by: + +.EQ I + ~roman center ( lambda )~mark = roman cslit + roman curve ( lambda ) +.EN +.EQ I +roman lower ( lambda )~lineup = roman center ( lambda ) + roman lslit +.EN +.EQ I +roman upper ( lambda )~lineup = roman center ( lambda ) + roman uslit +.EN + +where $lambda$ is the wavelength coordinate. Note that both the lower and +upper constants are added to the center defined by the aperture center and +the offset curve. The aperture limits along the dispersion axis are +constant since there is no offset curve: + +.EQ I +roman center (s)~lineup = roman cdisp +.EN +.EQ I +roman lower (s)~lineup = roman center (s) + roman ldisp +.EN +.EQ I +roman upper (s)~lineup = roman center (s) + roman udisp +.EN + +.PP +Apertures for a particular image may be defined in several ways. +These methods are arranged in a hierarchy. + +.IP (1) +The database is first searched for previously defined apertures. +.IP (2) +If no apertures are found and a reference image is specified then the +database is searched for apertures defined for the reference image. +.IP (3) +The user may then edit the apertures interactively with graphics +commands if the \fIapedit\fR parameter is set. This includes creating +new apertures and deleting or modifying existing apertures. This +interactive editing procedure may be entered from any of the \fBapextract\fR +tasks. +.IP (4) +For the tasks \fBtrace\fR, \fBsumextract\fR, and \fBstripextract\fR +if no apertures are defined at this point a default aperture +is created consisting of the entire image with center at the center of +the image. Note that if an image section is used then the aperture +spans the image section only. +.IP (5) +Any apertures created, modified, or adopted from a reference image are recorded +in the database for the image. + +.PP +There are several important points to appreciate in the above logic. +First, any of the tasks may be used without prior use of the others. +For example one may use extract with the \fIapedit\fR switch set and +define the apertures to be extracted (except for tracing). +Alternatively the apertures may be defined with \fBapedit\fR +interactively and then traced and extracted noninteractively. Second, +image sections may be used to define apertures (step 4). For example +a list of image sections (such as are used in multislit spectra) may be +extracted directly and noninteractively. Third, multiple images may +use a reference image to define the same apertures. There are several +more options which are illustrated in the examples section. +.PP +Another subtlety is the way in which reference images may be +specified. The tasks in the package all accept list of images +(including image sections). Reference images may also be given as a +list of images. The lists, however, need not be of the same length. +The reference images in the reference image list are paired in order +with the input images. If the reference list ends before the image +list then the last reference image is used for the remaining images. +The most common situations are when there is no reference image, when +only one reference image is given for a set of input images, and when a +matching list of reference images is given. In the second case the +reference image refers to all the input images while in the last case +each input image has a reference image. +.PP +There is a trick which may be played with the reference images. If a list +of input images is given and the reference image is the same as the first +input image then only the first image need be done interactively. +This is because after the apertures for the first image have been defined +they are recorded in the database. Then when the database is searched +for apertures for the second image, the apertures of the reference image +will be available. +.NH +.PP +\fBApedit\fR is a generally interactive task which graphs a line of +an image along the slit axis and allows the user to define and edit +apertures with the graphics cursor. The defined apertures are recorded +in a database. The task \fBtrace\fR traces the positions of the +spectrum profiles from one wavelength to other wavelengths in the image +and fits a smooth curve to the positions. This allows apertures +to follow shifts in the spectrum along the slit axis. The tasks +\fBsumextract\fR and \fBstripextract\fR perform the actual aperture +extraction to one and two dimensional spectra. They have options for +performing background subtraction, detecting and replacing bad pixels, +modeling the spectrum profile, and weighting the pixels in the aperture +when summing across the dispersion. +.NH +Tracing +.PP +The spectra to be extracted are not always aligned exactly with the +image columns or lines (the extraction axes). +For consistent extraction it is important that the same +part of the spectrum profile be extracted at each wavelength point. +Thus, the extraction apertures allow for shifts along the spatial axis +at each dispersion point. The shifts are defined by a curve which is a +function of the wavelength. The curve is determined by tracing the +positions of the spectrum profile at a number of wavelengths and +fitting a function to these positions. +.PP +The task \fBtrace\fR performs the tracing and curve fitting and records +the curve in the database. The starting point along the +dispersion axis (a line or column) for the tracing is specified by the +user. The position of the profile is then determined using the +\fBcenter1d\fR algorithm described elsewhere (see the help page for +\fBcenter1d\fR or the paper \fIThe Long Slit Reduction Package\fR). +The user specifies a step along the dispersion axis. At each step the +positions of the profiles are redetermined using the preceding +position as the initial guess. In order to enhance and trace weak +spectra the user may specify a number of neighboring profiles to be +summed before determining the profile positions. +.PP +Once the +positions have been traced from the starting point to the ends of the +aperture, or until the positions become indeterminate, a curve of a +specified type and order is fit to the positions as a function of +wavelength. The function fitting is performed with the \fBicfit\fR +tools (see the IRAF help page). The curve fitting may be performed +interactively or noninteractively. Note that when the curve is fit +interactively the actually positions measured are graphed. However, the +curve is stored in the aperture definition as an offset relative to the +aperture center. +.PP +The tracing requires that the spectrum profile have a shape from which +\fBcenter1d\fR can determine a position. This pretty much means +gaussian type profiles. To extract a part of a long slit spectrum +which does not have such a profile the user must trace a profile from +another part of the image or a different image and then shift the +center of the aperture without changing the shape. For example the +center of a extended galaxy spectrum can be traced and the aperture +shifted to other parts of the galaxy. +.NH +Extraction +.PP +There are two types of extraction; strip extraction and sum +extraction. Strip extraction produces two dimensional images with +pixels corresponding to the center of an aperture aligned along the +lines or columns. Sum extraction consists of the weighted sum of the +pixels within an aperture along the image axis nearest the spatial axis +at each point along the dispersion direction. It is important to +understand that the extraction is along image lines or columns while +the actual dispersion/spatial coordinates may not be aligned exactly +with the image axes. If this misalignment is important then for simple +rotations the task \fBrotate\fR in the \fBimages\fR package may be used +while for more complex coordinate rectifications the tasks in the +\fBlongslit\fR package may be used. +.NH 2 +Sum Extraction +.PP +Denote the image axis nearest the spatial axis by the index $s$ and +the other image axis corresponding to the dispersion axis by $lambda$. +The extraction is defined by the equation + +.EQ I (1) +f sub lambda~=~sum from s (W sub sl (I sub sl - B sub sl ) / P sub sl ) / +sum from s W sub sl +.EN + +where the sums are over all pixels along the spatial axis within some +aperture. The $W$ are weights, the $I$ are pixel intensities, +the $B$ are background intensities, and the $P$ are a normalized +profile model. +.PP +There are many possible choices for the extraction weights. The extraction +task currently provides two: + +.EQ I (2a) +W sub sl~mark =~P sub sl +.EN +.EQ I (2b) +W sub sl~lineup =~P sub sl sup 2 / V sub sl +.EN + +where $V sub sl$ is the variance of the pixel intensities given by the +model + +.EQ I + V sub sl~=~v sub 0 + v sub 1~max (0,~I sub sl )~~~~if v sub 0~>~0 +.EN +.EQ I + V sub sl~=~v sub 1~max (1,~I sub sl )~~~~~~~~~if v sub 0~=~0 +.EN + +Substituting these weights in equation (1) yields the extraction equations + +.EQ I (3a) +f sub lambda~mark =~sum from s (I sub sl - B sub sl ) +.EN +.EQ I (3b) +f sub lambda~lineup =~sum from s (P sub sl (I sub sl - B sub sl ) / V sub sl ) / +sum from s (P sub sl sup 2 / V sub sl ) +.EN + +.PP +The first type of weighting (2a), called \fIprofile\fR weighting, weights +by the profile. Since the weights cancel this gives the simple extraction (3a) +consisting of the direct summation of the pixels within the aperture. +It has the virtue of being simple and computationally fast (since the +profile model does not have to be determined). +.PP +The second type of weighting (2b), called \fIvariance\fR weighting, +uses a model for the variance of the pixel intensities. +The model is based on Poisson statistics for a linear quantum detector. +The first term is commanly call the \fIreadout\fR noise and the second term +is the Poisson noise. The actual value of $v sub 1$ is the reciprical of +the number of photons per digital intensity unit (ADU). A simple variant of +this type of weighting is to let $v sub 1$ equal zero. Since the actual +scale of the variance cancels we can then set $v sub 0$ to unity to obtain + +.EQ I (4) +f sub lambda~=~sum from s (P sub sl (I sub sl - B sub sl )) / +sum from s P sub sl sup 2 . +.EN + +The interpretation of this extraction is that the variance of the intensities +is constant. It gives greater weight to the stronger parts of the spectrum +profile than does the profile weighting (3a) since the weights are +$P sub sl sup 2$. Equation (4) has the virtue that one need not know the +readout noise or the ADU to photon number conversion. +.NH 3 +Optimal Extraction +.PP +Variance weighted extraction is sometimes called optimal extraction because +it is optimal in a statistical sense. Specifically, +the relative contribution of a pixel to the sum is related to the uncertainty +of its intensity. The uncertainty is measured by the expected variance of +a pixel with that intensity. The degree of optimality depends on how well +the relative variances of the pixels are known. +.PP +A discussion of the concepts behind optimal extraction is given in the paper +\fIAn Optimal Extraction Algorithm for CCD Spectroscopy\fR by Keith Horne +(\fBPASP\fR, June 1986). The weighting described in Horne's paper is the +same as the variance weighting described in this paper. The differences +in the algorithms are primarily in how the model profiles $P sub sl$ are +determined. +.NH 3 +Profile Determination +.PP +The profiles of the spectra along the spatial axis are determined when +either the detection and replacement of bad pixels or variance +weighting are specified. The requirements on the profiles are that +they have the same shape as the image profiles at a each dispersion +point and that they be as noise free and uncontaminated as possible. +The algorithm used to create these profiles is to average a specified +number of consecutive background subtracted image profiles immediately +preceding the wavelength to which a profile refers. When there are an +insufficient number of image profiles preceding the wavelength being +extracted then the following image profiles are also used to make up +the desired number. The image profiles are interpolated to a common +center before averaging using the curve given in the aperture +definition. The averaging reduces the noise in the image data while +the centering eliminates shifts in the spectrum as a function of +wavelength which would broaden the profile relative to the profile of a +single image line or column. It is assumed that the spectrum profile +changes slowly with wavelength so that by using profiles near a given +wavelength the average profile shape will correctly reflect the profile +of the spectrum at that wavelength. +.PP +The average profiles are determined in parallel with the extraction, +which proceeds sequentially through the image. Initially the first set +of spectrum profiles is read from the image and interpolated to a common +center. The profiles are averaged excluding the first profile to be +extracted; the image profiles in the average never include the image +profile to be extracted. Subsequently the average profile is updated +by adding the last extracted image profile and subtracting the image +profile which no longer belongs in the average. This allows each image +profile to be accessed and interpolated only once and makes the +averaging computationally efficient. This scheme also allows excluding +bad pixels from the average profile. The average profile is used to +locate and replace bad pixels in the image profile being extracted as +discussed in the following sections. Then when this profile is added +into the average for the next image profile the detected bad pixels are +no longer in the profile. +.PP +In summary this algorithm for determining the spectrum profile +has the following advantages: + +.IP (1) +No model dependent smoothing is done. +.IP (2) +There is no assumption required about the shape of the profile. +The only requirement is that the profile shape change slowly. +.IP (3) +Only one pass through the image is required and each image profile +is accessed only once. +.IP (4) +The buffered moving average is very efficient computationally. +.IP (5) +Bad pixels are detected and removed from the profile average as the +extraction proceeds. + +.NH 3 +Detection and Elimination of Bad Pixels +.PP +One of the important features of the aperture extraction package is the +detection and elimination of bad pixels. The average profile described +in the previous section is used to find pixels which deviate from this +profile. The algorithm is straightforward. A model spectrum of the +image profile is obtained by scaling the normalized profile to the +image profile. The scale factor is determined using chi squared fitting: + +.EQ I (6) +M sub sl~=~P sub sl~left { sum from s ((I sub sl - B sub sl ) P sub sl / +V sub sl)~/~ sum from s (P sub sl sup 2 / V sub sl ) right } . +.EN + +The RMS of this fit is determined and pixels deviating by more than a +user specified factor times this RMS are rejected. The fit is then +repeated excluding the rejected points. These steps are repeated until +the user specified number of points have been rejected or no further deviant +points are detected. The rejected points in the image profile are then +replaced by their model values. +.PP +This algorithm is based only on the assumption that the spatial profile +of the spectrum (no matter what it is) changes slowly with wavelength. +It is very sensitive at detecting departures from the expected profile. +Its main defect is that in the first pass at the fit all of the image profile +is used. If there is a very badly deviant point and the rest of the profile +is weak then the scale factor may favor the bad pixel more than the +rest of the profile resulting in rejecting good profile points and not +the bad pixel. +.NH 3 +Relation of Optimal Extraction to Model Extraction +.PP +Equation (1) defines the extraction process in terms of a weighted sum +of the pixel intensities. However, the actual extraction operations +performed by the task \fBsumextract\fR are + +.EQ I (7a) +f sub lambda~mark =~sum from s (I sub sl - B sub sl ) +.EN +.EQ I (7b) +f sub lambda~lineup =~sum from s M sub sl +.EN + +where $M sub sl$ is the model spectrum fit to the background subtracted +image spectrum $(I sub sl - B sub sl )$ +defined in the previous section (equation 6). It is not obvious at first that +(7b) is equivalent to (3b). However, if one sums (6) and uses the fact +that the sum of the normalized profile is unity one is left with equation (3b). +.PP +Equations (6) and (7b) provide an alternate way to think about the +extracted one dimensional spectra. Sum extraction of the model spectrum +is used instead of the weighted sum for variance weighted extraction +because the model spectrum is a product of the profile determination +and the bad pixel cleaning process. It is then more convenient +and efficient to use the simple equations (7). +.NH 2 +Strip Extraction +.PP +The task \fBstripextract\fR uses one dimensional image interpolation +to shift the pixels along the spatial axes so that in the resultant +output image the center of the aperture is exactly aligned with the +image lines or columns. The cleaning of bad pixels is an option +in this extraction using the methods described above. In addition +the model spectrum described above may be extracted as a two +dimensional image. In fact, the only difference between strip extraction +and sum extraction is whether the final step of summing the pixels +in the aperture along the spatial axis is performed. +.PP +The primary use of \fBstripextract\fR is as a diagnostic tool. It +allows the user to see the background subtracted, cleaned and/or model +spectrum as an image before it is summed to a one dimensional spectrum. +In addition the two dimensional format allows use of other IRAF tools such as +smoothing operators. When appropriate +it is a much simpler method of removing detector distortions and alignment +errors than the full two dimensional mapping and image transformation +available with the \fBlongslit\fR package. +.NH +Examples +.de CS +.nf +.ft L +.. +.de CE +.fi +.ft R +.. +.PP +This section is included because the flexibility and many options of +the tasks allows a wide range of applications. The examples illustrate +the use of the task parameters for manipulating input images, output +images, and reference images, and setting apertures interactively and +noninteractively. They do not illustrate the different possibilities +in extraction or the interactive aperture definition and editing +features. These examples are meant to be relevant to actual data +reduction and analysis problems. For the purpose of these examples we +will assume the dispersion axis is along the second image axis; i.e. +DISPAXIS = 2. +.PP +The simplest problem is the extraction of an object spectrum which +is centered on column 200. To extract the spectrum with an aperture +width of 20 pixels an image section can be used. + +.CS +cl> sumextract image[190:209,*] obj1d +cl> stripextract image[190:209,*] obj2d +.CE + +To set the aperture center and limits interactively the edit option can be +used with or without the image section. This also allows fractional pixel +centering and limits. +.PP +If the object slit position changes the spectrum profile can be traced first +and then extracted. + +.CS +cl> trace image[190:209,*] +cl> sumextract image[190:209,*] obj1d +cl> stripextract image[190:209,*] obj2d +.CE + +By default the apertures are defined and/or edited interactively in +\fBtrace\fR and editing is not the default in \fBsumextract\fR or +\fBstripextract\fR. +.PP +A more typical example involves many images. In this case a list of images +is used though, of course, each image could be done separately as +in the previous examples. There are three common forms of lists, a +pattern matching template, a comma separated list, and an "@" file. +In addition the template editing metacharacter, "%", may be used +to create new output image names based on input image names. +If the object positions are different in each image then we can select +apertures with image sections or using the editing option. Some examples +are + +.CS +cl> sumextract image1[10:29,*],image2[32:51] obj1,obj2 +cl> sumextract image* e//image* edit+ +cl> sumextract image* image%%ex%* edit+ +cl> sumextract @images @images edit+ +.CE + +The "@" files can be created from the other two types of lists using the +\fBsections\fR task in the \fBimages\fR package. An important feature +of the image templates is the use of the concatenation operator. Note, +however, this a feature of image templates and not file templates. +Also the output root name may be the same as the input +name because an extension is added provided there are no image +sections in the input images. +.PP +If the object positions are the same then the apertures can be defined once +and the remaining objects can be extracted using a reference image. + +.CS +cl> apedit image1 +cl> sumextract image* image* ref=image1 +.CE + +Rather than using \fBapedit\fR one can use \fBsumextract\fR alone with +the edit switch set. The command is + +.CS +cl> sumextract image* image* ref=image1 edit+ +.CE + +The task queries whether to edit the apertures for each image. +For the first image respond with "yes" and set the apertures interactively. +For the second task respond with "NO". Since the aperture for "image1" +was recorded when the first image was extracted it then acts as the reference +for the remaining images. The emphatic response "NO" turns off the edit switch +for all the other images. One difference between this example and the +previous one is that the task cannot be run as a background batch task. +.PP +The extension to using traced apertures in the preceding examples is +very similar. + +.CS +cl> apedit image1 +cl> trace image* ref=image1 edit- +cl> sumextract image* image* +cl> stripextract image* image* +.CE + +.PP +Another common type of data has multiple spectra on each image. Some examples +are echelle and multislit spectra. Echelle extractions usually are done +interactively with tracing. Thus, the commands are + +.CS +cl> trace ech* +cl> sumextract ech* ech* +.CE + +For multislit spectra the slitlets are usually referenced by creating +an "@" file containing the image sections. The usage for extraction +is then + +.CS +cl> sumextract @slits @slitsout +.CE + +.PP +The aperture definitions can be transfered from a reference image to +other images using \fBapedit\fR. There is no particular reason to +do this except that reference images would not be needed in +\fBtrace\fR, \fBsumextract\fR or \fBstripextract\fR. The transfer +is accomplished with the following command + +.CS +cl> apedit image1 +cl> apedit image* ref=image1 edit- +.CE + +The above can also be combined into one step by editing the first image +and then responding with "NO" to the second image query. +.NH +Future Developments +.PP +The IRAF extraction package \fBapextract\fR is going to continue to +evolve because 1) the extraction of one and two dimensional spectra +from two dimensional images is an important part of reducing echelle, +longslit, multislit, and multiaperture spectra, 2) the final strategy +for handling multislit and multiaperture spectra produced by aperture +masks or fiber optic mapping has not yet been determined, and 3) the +extraction package and the algorithms have not received sufficient user +testing and evaluation. Changes may include some of the following. + +.IP (1) +Determine the actual variance from the data rather than using the Poisson +CCD model. +.IP (2) +Another task, possibly called \fBapfind\fR, is needed to automatically find +profile positions in multiaperture, multislit, and echelle spectra. +.IP (3) +The bad pixel detection and removal algorithm does not handle well the case +of a very strong cosmic ray event on top of a very weak spectrum profile. +A heuristic method to make the first fitting pass of the average +profile to the image data less prone to errors due to strong cosmic rays +is needed. +.IP (4) +The aperture definition structure is general enough to allow the aperture +limits along the dispersion dimension to be variable. Eventually aperture +definition and editing will be available using an image display. Then +both graphics and image display editing switches will be available. +An image display interface will make extraction of objective prism +spectra more convenient than it is now. +.IP (5) +Other types of extraction weighting may be added. +.IP (6) +Allow the extraction to be locally perpendicular to the traced curve. |